Some fixes for public domain section.
This commit is contained in:
parent
59eec91da7
commit
a625e05c30
1 changed files with 23 additions and 15 deletions
38
gpl-lgpl.tex
38
gpl-lgpl.tex
|
@ -375,11 +375,10 @@ effectively no longer restricted by copyright law. Software not restricted by
|
|||
|
||||
\subsection{Public Domain Software}
|
||||
|
||||
Theoretically, an author can create public domain software by disclaiming all
|
||||
copyright interest on the work. In the USA and other countries that have
|
||||
signed the Berne convention on copyright, software is copyrighted
|
||||
automatically by the author when she ``fixes the software into a tangible
|
||||
medium.'' In the software world, this usually means typing the source code
|
||||
In the USA and other countries that
|
||||
are parties to the Berne convention on copyright, software is copyrighted
|
||||
automatically by the author when she fixes the software in a tangible
|
||||
medium. In the software world, this usually means typing the source code
|
||||
of the software into a file.
|
||||
|
||||
Imagine if authors could truly disclaim those default control of copyright
|
||||
|
@ -389,20 +388,22 @@ restrictions on software (i.e., prohibition of copying, modification, and
|
|||
redistribution), removing the software from the copyright system usually
|
||||
yields software freedom for its users.
|
||||
|
||||
Carefully note that software in the public domain is \emph{not} licensed
|
||||
in any way. It is nonsensical to say software is ``licensed for the
|
||||
Carefully note that software truly in the public domain is \emph{not} licensed
|
||||
in any way. It is confusing to say software is ``licensed for the
|
||||
public domain,'' or any phrase that implies the copyright holder gave
|
||||
expressed permission to take actions governed by copyright law.
|
||||
express permission to take actions governed by copyright law.
|
||||
|
||||
By contrast, the copyright holders instead renounced copyright controls on
|
||||
Copyright holders who state that they are releasing their code into
|
||||
the public domain are effectively renouncing copyright controls on
|
||||
the work. The law gave the copyright holder exclusive controls over the
|
||||
work, and they chose to waive those controls. Software in the public domain
|
||||
is absent copyright and absent a license. The software freedoms discussed in
|
||||
work, and they chose to waive those controls. Software that is, in
|
||||
this sense, in the public domain
|
||||
is conceptualized by the developer as having no copyright and thus no license. The software freedoms discussed in
|
||||
Section~\ref{Free Software Definition} are all granted because there is no
|
||||
legal system in play to take them away.
|
||||
|
||||
Admittedly, a discussion of public domain software is an oversimplified
|
||||
example. First, disclaimer of copyright is actually difficult in practice.
|
||||
example.
|
||||
Because copyright controls are usually automatically granted and because, in
|
||||
some jurisdictions, some copyright controls cannot be waived (See
|
||||
Section~\ref{non-usa-copyright} for further discussion), many copyright
|
||||
|
@ -414,10 +415,17 @@ simply purchased on the installment plan rather than in whole. Thus, we must
|
|||
assume no works of software will fall into the public domain merely due to
|
||||
the passage of time.
|
||||
|
||||
The best example of software known to be in the public domain is software
|
||||
that is published exclusively produced by the USA government. Under
|
||||
Nevertheless, under US law it is likely that the typical
|
||||
disclaimers of copyright or public domain dedications we see in the
|
||||
Free Software world would be interpreted by courts as copyright
|
||||
abandonment, leading to a situation in which the user effectively receives a
|
||||
maximum grant of copyright freedoms, similar to a maximally-permissive
|
||||
Free Software license.
|
||||
|
||||
The best example of software known to truly be in the public domain is software
|
||||
that is published by the US government. Under
|
||||
\href{http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/105}{17 USC 101 \S~105}, all
|
||||
works published by the USA Government are not copyrightable.
|
||||
works published by the USA Government are not copyrightable in the US.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Why Copyright Free Software?}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue