diff --git a/gpl-lgpl.tex b/gpl-lgpl.tex
index ec3f86b..c66123c 100644
--- a/gpl-lgpl.tex
+++ b/gpl-lgpl.tex
@@ -2457,7 +2457,7 @@ readily substituted by other existing implementations.  While copyleft
 advocates never doubted this was required under GPLv2's definition of CCS,
 GPLv3 makes it abundantly clear with an extra example.
 
-GPL, as always, seeks to ensure users are truly in a position to install and
+The GPL, as always, seeks to ensure users are truly in a position to install and
 run their modified versions of the program; the CCS definition is designed to
 be expansive to ensure this software freedom.  However, although the
 definition of CCS is expansive, it is not sufficient to protect users'
@@ -2492,14 +2492,13 @@ The previous section skipped over one part of the CCS definition, the
 so-called system library exception.  The ``System Libraries'' definition (and
 the ``Standard Interface'' and ``Major Component'' definitions, which it
 includes) are designed as part
-
 to permit certain distribution arrangements that are considered reasonable by
 copyleft advocates.  The system library exception is designed to allow
 copylefted software to link with these libraries when such linking would hurt
 software freedom more than it would hurt proprietary software.
 
 The system library exception has two parts.  Part (a) rewords the GPLv2
-exception for clarity replaces GPLv2's words ``unless that component itself
+exception for clarity replacing GPLv2's words ``unless that component itself
 accompanies the executable'' with ``which is not part of the Major
 Component''.  The goal here is to not require disclosure of source code of
 certain libraries, such as necessary Microsoft Windows DLLs (which aren't