Rewrite this paragraph on GPLv3§6(d)
This commit is contained in:
parent
a5079818d4
commit
9de90679bb
1 changed files with 13 additions and 11 deletions
24
gpl-lgpl.tex
24
gpl-lgpl.tex
|
@ -2853,23 +2853,25 @@ formally typical historical interpretation of GPLv2.
|
|||
% FIXME-LATER: perhaps in enforcement section, but maybe here, note about
|
||||
% ``slow down'' on source downloads being a compliance problem.
|
||||
|
||||
% FIXME: where should this go?
|
||||
|
||||
We improved the wording of this sentence to provide a clearer expression of
|
||||
the intended policy. Under the 6d option, you may charge for the conveyed
|
||||
object code. Those who pay to obtain the object code must be given equivalent
|
||||
and gratis access to obtain the Corresponding Source. (If you convey the
|
||||
object code to them gratis, you must likewise make the Corresponding Source
|
||||
available to them without charge.) Those who do not obtain the object code
|
||||
from you, perhaps because they choose not to pay the fee you charge, are
|
||||
outside the scope of the provision; you need not give them any kind of access
|
||||
to the Corresponding Source.
|
||||
Furthermore, under GPLv3~\S6(d), distributors may charge for the conveyed
|
||||
object code; however, those who pay to obtain the object code must be given
|
||||
equivalent and gratis access to obtain the CCS. (If distributors convey the
|
||||
object code gratis, distributors must likewise make CCS available without
|
||||
charge.) Those who do not obtain the object code from that distributors
|
||||
(perhaps because they choose not to pay the fee for object code) are outside
|
||||
the scope of the provision; distributors are under no specific obligation to
|
||||
give CCS to someone who has not purchased an object code download under
|
||||
GPLv3~\S6(d). (Note: this does not change nor impact any obligations under
|
||||
GPLv3~\S6(b)(2); GPLv3~\S6(d) is a wholly different provision.)
|
||||
|
||||
%FIXME: 6e, peer-to-peer
|
||||
|
||||
Informing the peers is clearly enough; what seemed to be an additional
|
||||
knowledge requirement was superfluous wording.
|
||||
|
||||
% FIXME-LATER: Would be nice to explain much more about interactions between
|
||||
% the various options of GPLv3~\S6(a-e), which might all be in play at once!
|
||||
|
||||
% FIXME: Not final paragraph anymore.
|
||||
|
||||
The final paragraph of section 6 takes account of the fact that the Complete
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue