Consolidate and remove unneeded FIXMEs.
This commit is contained in:
parent
bb29c91417
commit
96735e78d0
1 changed files with 2 additions and 16 deletions
18
gpl-lgpl.tex
18
gpl-lgpl.tex
|
@ -3216,23 +3216,9 @@ pathological case\footnote{Theoretically, a user could collect copyright
|
|||
%% is required by trademark law, and may not prohibit what would constitute fair
|
||||
%% use.
|
||||
|
||||
% FIXME: removing additional restrictions
|
||||
% FIXME-LATER: Say removing additional restrictions
|
||||
|
||||
% FIXME: probably mostly still right, needs some updates, though.
|
||||
|
||||
Section 7 requires a downstream user of a covered work to preserve the
|
||||
non-GPL terms covering the added parts just as they must preserve the GPL, as
|
||||
long as any substantial portion of those parts is present in the user's
|
||||
version.
|
||||
|
||||
% FIXME: minor rewrites needed
|
||||
|
||||
Section 7 points out that GPLv3 itself makes no assertion that an additional
|
||||
requirement is enforceable by the copyright holder. However, section 7 makes
|
||||
clear that enforcement of such requirements is expected to be by the
|
||||
termination procedure given in section 8 of GPLv3.
|
||||
|
||||
% FIXME: better context, etc.
|
||||
% FIXME-LATER: This text may be useful later:
|
||||
|
||||
Some have questioned whether section 7 is needed, and some have suggested
|
||||
that it creates complexity that did not previously exist. We point out to
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue