RMS is right; the word ecosystem is problematic. I'm removing it.
See https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Ecosystem
This commit is contained in:
parent
9d5ac7e5c1
commit
7e922009ee
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -490,13 +490,13 @@ concept behind copyleft, but to actually make it work in the real world, a
|
|||
true implementation in legal text must exist. The GPL is the primary
|
||||
implementation of copyleft in copyright licensing language.
|
||||
|
||||
\section{An Ecosystem of Equality}
|
||||
\section{A Community of Equality}
|
||||
|
||||
The GPL uses copyright law to defend freedom and equally ensure users'
|
||||
rights. This ultimately creates an ecosystem of equality for both
|
||||
rights. This ultimately creates an community of equality for both
|
||||
business and noncommercial users.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{The Noncommercial Ecosystem}
|
||||
\subsection{The Noncommercial Community}
|
||||
|
||||
A GPL'd code base becomes a center of a vibrant development and user
|
||||
community. Traditionally, volunteers, operating noncommercially out of
|
||||
|
@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ Because of the symmetry and fairness inherent in GPL'd distribution,
|
|||
nearly every GPL'd package in existence has a vibrant noncommercial user
|
||||
and developer base.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{The Commercial Ecosystem}
|
||||
\subsection{The Commercial Community}
|
||||
|
||||
By the same token, nearly all established GPL'd software systems have a
|
||||
vibrant commercial community. Nearly every GPL'd system that has gained
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue