diff --git a/gpl-lgpl.tex b/gpl-lgpl.tex index 3b287c7..992a4ac 100644 --- a/gpl-lgpl.tex +++ b/gpl-lgpl.tex @@ -1099,14 +1099,14 @@ Also mentioned by name is the warranty disclaimer. Most people today do not believe that software comes with any warranty. Notwithstanding the \href{http://mlis.state.md.us/2000rs/billfile/hb0019.htm}{Maryland's} and \href{http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?001+ful+SB372ER}{Virginia's} UCITA bills, there are few or no implied warranties with software. However, just to be on the safe side, GPL clearly disclaims them, and the -GPL requires re distributors to keep the disclaimer very visible. (See +GPL requires re-distributors to keep the disclaimer very visible. (See Sections~\ref{GPLv2s11} and~\ref{GPLv2s12} of this tutorial for more on GPL's warranty disclaimers.) Note finally that GPLv2~\S1 creates groundwork for the important defense of commercial freedom. GPLv2~\S1 clearly states that in the case of verbatim -copies, one may make money. Re distributors are fully permitted to charge -for the redistribution of copies of Free Software. In addition, they may +copies, one may make money. Re-distributors are fully permitted to charge +for the re-distribution of copies of Free Software. In addition, they may provide the warranty protection that the GPL disclaims as an additional service for a fee. (See Section~\ref{Business Models} for more discussion on making a profit from Free Software redistribution.) @@ -1118,7 +1118,7 @@ on making a profit from Free Software redistribution.) We digress for this chapter from our discussion of GPL's exact text to consider the matter of derivative works --- a concept that we must -understand fully before considering GPLv2~\S\S2--3\@. GPL, and Free +understand fully before considering GPLv2~\S\S2--3\@. The GPL, and Free Software licensing in general, relies critically on the concept of ``derivative work'' since software that is ``independent,'' (i.e., not ``derivative'') of Free Software need not abide by the terms of the