Copyleft/guide
6
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Finish section.

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Bradley M. Kuhn 2014-03-20 18:57:14 -04:00
parent a5bf35174c
commit 7940504216
1 changed files with 15 additions and 10 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

25
gpl-lgpl.tex
View file

@ -3269,18 +3269,23 @@ the working of the license.
\section{GPLv3~\S10: Explicit Downstream License} \section{GPLv3~\S10: Explicit Downstream License}
% FIXME-LATER: this is a punt: need more time to write!
GPLv3~\S10 ensures that everyone downstream receives licenses from all
copyright holders. It really is a generally straightforward section.
% FIXME-LATER: link up this paragraph to above sections. % FIXME-LATER: link up this paragraph to above sections.
GPLv3 removed the words ``at no charge'' from GPLv2~\S2(b) (in GPLv3,~\S5(b)) Note, however, GPLv3 removed the words ``at no charge'' from GPLv2~\S2(b) (in
because it contributed to a misconception that the GPL did not permit GPLv3,~\S5(b)) because it contributed to a misconception that the GPL did not
charging for distribution of copies. The purpose of the ``at no charge'' permit charging for distribution of copies. The purpose of the ``at no
wording was to prevent attempts to collect royalties from third parties. The charge'' wording was to prevent attempts to collect royalties from third
removal of these words created the danger that the imposition of licensing parties. The removal of these words created the danger that the imposition
fees would no longer be seen as a license violation. Therefore, GPLv3~\S10 of licensing fees would no longer be seen as a license violation. Therefore,
adds a new explicit prohibition on imposition of licensing fees or royalties. GPLv3~\S10 adds a new explicit prohibition on imposition of licensing fees or
This section is an appropriate place for such a clause, since it is a royalties. This section is an appropriate place for such a clause, since it
specific consequence of the general requirement that no further restrictions is a specific consequence of the general requirement that no further
be imposed on downstream recipients of GPL-covered code. restrictions be imposed on downstream recipients of GPL-covered code.
Careful readers of the GPL have suggested that its explicit prohibition Careful readers of the GPL have suggested that its explicit prohibition
against imposition of further restrictions\footnote{GPLv2, section 6; Draft against imposition of further restrictions\footnote{GPLv2, section 6; Draft