Integrate case law reference on conspicuousness into this existing text.

Include my lawyer-bashing-ish little anecdote too, just for fun.

gpl-lgpl.tex

@@ -2149,14 +2149,22 @@ There is apparently general acceptance that \textsc{all caps} is the
 preferred way to make something conspicuous, and that has over decades worked
 its way into the voodoo tradition of warranty disclaimer writing.
 
-% FIXME: Admittedly, goes here ?
-
-There is authority under United States law suggesting that effective warranty
-disclaimers must be ``conspicuous,'' and that conspicuousness can be
-established by capitalization and is absent when a disclaimer has the same
-typeface as the terms surrounding it (see \textit{Stevenson v.~TRW, Inc.},
-987 F.2d 288, 296 (5th Cir.~1993)).  We have reason to doubt that such
-authority would apply to copyright licenses like the GPL.
+That said, there is admittedly some authority under USA law suggesting that
+effective warranty disclaimers that conspicuousness can be established by
+capitalization and is absent when a disclaimer has the same typeface as the
+terms surrounding it (see \textit{Stevenson v.~TRW, Inc.}, 987 F.2d 288, 296
+(5th Cir.~1993)).  While GPLv3's drafters doubted that such authority would
+apply to copyright licenses like the GPL, the FSF has nevertheless left
+warranty and related disclaimers in \textsc{all caps} throughout all versions
+of GPL\@\footnote{\textsc{One of the authors of this tutorial, Bradley
+    M.~Kuhn, has often suggested that as compromise, use of a specifically
+    designed ``small caps'' font, such as the one used herein, is
+    aesthetically preferable to merely} WRITING IN ALL CAPS IN THE DEFAULT
+  FONT (LIKE THIS), WHICH SEEMS TO ADD UGLINESS RATHER THAN
+  CONSPICUOUSNESS\@.  Indeed, Kuhn once got into a reversion war in a
+  document with a lawyer who disagreed with this, but the lawyer in question
+  ignored Kuhn's requests to produce any case law that argued THIS IS MORE
+  CONSPICUOUS \textit{Than this is}.}.
 
 Some have argued the GPL is unenforceable in some jurisdictions because
 its disclaimer of warranties is impermissibly broad.  However, GPLv2~\S11