Reword these two paragraphs.
This commit is contained in:
parent
5111178260
commit
6d5ca098a1
1 changed files with 11 additions and 19 deletions
30
gpl-lgpl.tex
30
gpl-lgpl.tex
|
@ -2893,26 +2893,18 @@ transmission time. Third, in current practice, CCS packages themselves tend
|
||||||
-- thus, there generally will be too few participants downloading the same
|
-- thus, there generally will be too few participants downloading the same
|
||||||
source package at the same time to enable effective seeding and distribution.
|
source package at the same time to enable effective seeding and distribution.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% FIXME: rewrite a bit.
|
GPLv3~\S6(e) addresses this issues. If a licensee conveys such a work of
|
||||||
|
object code using peer-to-peer transmission, that licensee is in compliance
|
||||||
|
with GPLv3~\S6 if the licensee informs other peers where the object code and
|
||||||
|
its CCS are publicly available at no charge under subsection GPLv3~\S6(d).
|
||||||
|
The CCS therefore need not be provided through the peer-to-peer system that
|
||||||
|
was used for providing the binary.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
We have made two changes that recognize and facilitate distribution of
|
Second, GPLv3\S9 also clarifies that ancillary propagation of a covered work
|
||||||
covered works in object code form using BitTorrent or similar peer-to-peer
|
that occurs as part of the process of peer-to-peer file transmission does not
|
||||||
methods. First, under new subsection 6e, if a licensee conveys such a work
|
require acceptance, just as mere receipt and execution of the Program does
|
||||||
using peer-to-peer transmission, that licensee is in compliance with section
|
not require acceptance. Such ancillary propagation is permitted without
|
||||||
6 so long as the licensee knows, and informs other peers where, the object
|
limitation or further obligation.
|
||||||
code and its Corresponding Source are publicly available at no charge under
|
|
||||||
subsection 6d. The Corresponding Source therefore need not be provided
|
|
||||||
through the peer-to-peer system that was used for providing the binary.
|
|
||||||
Second, we have revised section 9 to make clear that ancillary propagation of
|
|
||||||
a covered work that occurs as part of the process of peer-to-peer file
|
|
||||||
transmission does not require acceptance, just as mere receipt and execution
|
|
||||||
of the Program does not require acceptance. Such ancillary propagation is
|
|
||||||
permitted without limitation or further obligation.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% FIXME: where does this go?
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Informing the peers is clearly enough; what seemed to be an additional
|
|
||||||
knowledge requirement was superfluous wording.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
% FIXME-LATER: Would be nice to explain much more about interactions between
|
% FIXME-LATER: Would be nice to explain much more about interactions between
|
||||||
% the various options of GPLv3~\S6(a-e), which might all be in play at once!
|
% the various options of GPLv3~\S6(a-e), which might all be in play at once!
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue