Wordsmith paragraph.
This commit is contained in:
parent
929f60c316
commit
6cbb2d530d
2 changed files with 8 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -128,12 +128,15 @@ software.\footnote{This document addresses compliance with GPLv2,
|
|||
Political discussion about the GPL often centers around the ``copyleft''
|
||||
requirements of the license. Indeed, the license was designed primarily
|
||||
to embody this licensing feature. Most companies adding non-trivial
|
||||
features (beyond mere porting and bug-fixing) to GPL'd software, and
|
||||
thereby implicating these requirements, are already well aware of their
|
||||
more complex obligations under the license.\footnote{There has been much legal
|
||||
features (beyond mere porting and bug-fixing) to GPL'd software (and
|
||||
thereby invoking these requirements) are already well aware of their
|
||||
more complex obligations under the license.\footnote{While, there has been much legal
|
||||
discussion regarding copyleft and derivative works. In practical
|
||||
reality, this issue is not relevant to the vast majority of companies
|
||||
distributing GPL'd software.}
|
||||
distributing GPL'd software. Those interested in this issue should study
|
||||
\tutorialpartsplit{\texit{Detailed Analysis of the GNU GPL and Related
|
||||
Licenses}'s Section on derivative works}{\S~\ref{derivative-works} of
|
||||
this tutorial}.}
|
||||
|
||||
However, in our experience with GPL enforcement, few redistributors'
|
||||
compliance challenges relate directly to the copyleft provisions; this is
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1113,6 +1113,7 @@ on making a profit from Free Software redistribution.)
|
|||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
|
||||
\chapter{Derivative Works: Statute and Case Law}
|
||||
\label{derivative-works}
|
||||
|
||||
We digress for this chapter from our discussion of GPL's exact text to
|
||||
consider the matter of derivative works --- a concept that we must
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue