Copyleft/guide
6
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Wordsmithing in the public domain section.

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Bradley M. Kuhn 2014-03-15 13:56:28 -04:00
parent 1355337088
commit 62a0c3b4fb
1 changed files with 11 additions and 11 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

22
gpl-lgpl.tex
View file

@ -373,26 +373,26 @@ automatically by the author when she ``fixes the software into a tangible
medium.'' In the software world, this usually means typing the source code medium.'' In the software world, this usually means typing the source code
of the software into a file. of the software into a file.
Imagine if an author can truly disclaim that default control given to her by the Imagine if authors could truly disclaim those default control of copyright
copyright laws. Once this is done, the software is in the public domain law. If so, the software is in the public domain -- no longer covered by
--- it is no longer covered by copyright. Since it is copyright law that copyright. Since copyright law is the construction allowing for most
allows for various controls on software (i.e., prohibition of copying, restrictions on software (i.e., prohibition of copying, modification, and
modification, and redistribution), removing the software from the redistribution), removing the software from the copyright system usually
copyright system and placing it into the public domain does yield Free yields software freedom for its users.
Software.
Carefully note that software in the public domain is \emph{not} licensed Carefully note that software in the public domain is \emph{not} licensed
in any way. It is nonsensical to say software is ``licensed for the in any way. It is nonsensical to say software is ``licensed for the
public domain,'' or any phrase that implies the copyright holder gave public domain,'' or any phrase that implies the copyright holder gave
expressed permission to take actions governed by copyright law. expressed permission to take actions governed by copyright law.
By contrast, what the copyright holder has done is renounce her copyright By contrast, the copyright holders instead renounced copyright controls on
controls on the work. The law gave her controls over the work, and she the work. The law gave the copyright holder exclusive controls over the
has chosen to waive those controls. Software in the public domain is work, and they chose to waive those controls. Software in the public domain
absent copyright and absent a license. The software freedoms discussed in is absent copyright and absent a license. The software freedoms discussed in
Section~\ref{Free Software Definition} are all granted because there is no Section~\ref{Free Software Definition} are all granted because there is no
legal system in play to take them away. legal system in play to take them away.
\subsection{Why Copyright Free Software?} \subsection{Why Copyright Free Software?}
If simply disclaiming copyright on software yields Free Software, then it If simply disclaiming copyright on software yields Free Software, then it