We now have a chapter earlier that discusses this in more detail,
just reference that instead of this other text that was here.
This commit is contained in:
parent
0ebf2969f4
commit
618ddec730
1 changed files with 3 additions and 5 deletions
|
@ -701,6 +701,7 @@ economy.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||||
\chapter{A Tale of Two Copyleft Licenses}
|
\chapter{A Tale of Two Copyleft Licenses}
|
||||||
|
\label{tale-of-two-copylefts}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
While determining the proper methodology and criteria to yield an accurate
|
While determining the proper methodology and criteria to yield an accurate
|
||||||
count remains difficult, the GPL is generally considered one of the most
|
count remains difficult, the GPL is generally considered one of the most
|
||||||
|
@ -2082,11 +2083,8 @@ individuals and organizations, the license itself needs a single steward.
|
||||||
Forking of the code is often regrettable but basically innocuous. Forking
|
Forking of the code is often regrettable but basically innocuous. Forking
|
||||||
of licensing is disastrous.
|
of licensing is disastrous.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
FSF has only released two versions of GPL --- in 1989 and 1991. GPL
|
(Chapter~\ref{tale-of-two-copylefts} discusses more about the various
|
||||||
version 3 is under current internal drafting. FSF's plan is to have a
|
versions of GPL.)
|
||||||
long and engaging comment period. The goal of GPL is to defend freedom, and
|
|
||||||
a gigantic community depends on that freedom now. FSF hopes to take all
|
|
||||||
stakeholders' opinions under advisement.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\section{GPLv2~\S10: Relicensing Permitted}
|
\section{GPLv2~\S10: Relicensing Permitted}
|
||||||
\label{GPLv2s10}
|
\label{GPLv2s10}
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue