From 59bff741f28b8c7f0fc26a25a1eba65291229fa7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Bradley M. Kuhn" Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:00:54 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Small formatting fixes in this paragraph. --- gpl-lgpl.tex | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gpl-lgpl.tex b/gpl-lgpl.tex index 05d5676..08b0811 100644 --- a/gpl-lgpl.tex +++ b/gpl-lgpl.tex @@ -2291,8 +2291,8 @@ throughout the text of GPLv2, the definition of CCS\footnote{Note that the term of ``Corresponding Source''.}, or, as GPLv3 officially calls it, ``Corresponding Source'', is given in GPLv3~\S1\P4. This definition is as broad as necessary to protect users' exercise of their rights under the -GPL. We follow the definition with particular examples to remove any doubt -that they are to be considered Complete Corresponding Source Code. We wish to +GPL\@. We follow the definition with particular examples to remove any doubt +that they are to be considered Complete Corresponding Source Code. We wish to make completely clear that a licensee cannot avoid complying with the requirements of the GPL by dynamically linking an add-on component to the original version of a program.