Copyleft/guide
6
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Suggestions for in depth discussion of GPLv2§2(a)

Browse source 
GPLv2§2(a) is mentioned quite cursorily.  Olly Betts suggests more
coverage here might useful on IRC.  I noted some ideas after he
suggested it.
This commit is contained in:
Bradley M. Kuhn 2015-03-12 17:15:15 -07:00
parent ec2abce021
commit 555a72beb1
1 changed files with 10 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

10
gpl-lgpl.tex
View file

@ -1548,6 +1548,16 @@ here as well. However, there are three additional requirements.
\subsection{The Simpler Parts of GPLv2~\S2} \subsection{The Simpler Parts of GPLv2~\S2}
% FIXME: GPLv2~\S2(a) isn't discussed heavily here and more should be
% discussed about it. There have been developer questions. One idea I had
% was to write up:
% http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2011/03/11/linux-red-hat-gpl.html
% as a compliance case study specific to GPLv2 Section 2(a)
%
% Another point to discuss here -- or maybe it goes better in the compliance
% case study ? -- is to explain that git logs ARE adequate but possibly
% overkill.
The first (GPLv2~\S2(a)) requires that modified files carry ``prominent The first (GPLv2~\S2(a)) requires that modified files carry ``prominent
notices'' explaining what changes were made and the date of such notices'' explaining what changes were made and the date of such
changes. This section does not prescribe some specific way of changes. This section does not prescribe some specific way of