diff --git a/gpl-lgpl.tex b/gpl-lgpl.tex
index 6382e7e..ced4233 100644
--- a/gpl-lgpl.tex
+++ b/gpl-lgpl.tex
@@ -2398,7 +2398,7 @@ copyright licenses.
 Most warranty disclaimer language shouts at you.  The
 \href{http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/2/2-316}{Uniform Commercial
   Code~\S2-316}, which most of the USA's states and commonwealths have adopted as their local
-law, requires that disclaimers of warranty be ``conspicuous''.
+law, allows disclaimers of warranty, provided that the disclaimer is ``conspicuous''.
 There is apparently general acceptance that \textsc{all caps} is the
 preferred way to make something conspicuous, and that has over decades worked
 its way into the voodoo tradition of warranty disclaimer writing.
@@ -2419,13 +2419,41 @@ of GPL\@.\footnote{One of the authors of this tutorial, Bradley M.~Kuhn, has
   answered Kuhn's requests for case law that argues THIS IS INHERENTLY MORE
   CONSPICUOUS \textsc{Than this is}.}
 
-Some have argued the GPL is unenforceable in some jurisdictions because
-its disclaimer of warranties is impermissibly broad.  However, GPLv2~\S11
-contains a jurisdictional savings provision, which states that it is to be
-interpreted only as broadly as allowed by applicable law.  Such a
-provision ensures that both it, and the entire GPL, is enforceable in any
-jurisdiction, regardless of any particular law regarding the
-permissibility of certain warranty disclaimers.
+Critics have occasionally questioned GPL's enforceability in some jurisdictions because its
+disclaimer of warranties is impermissibly broad.  However,
+critics
+have generally failed to articulate specific precedents in their
+jurisdictions that would directly indicate a problem with GPL's warranty
+disclaimer.  Meanwhile,
+\href{http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/text/treaty.html#35}{Article 35 of
+  the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of
+  Goods} (often abbreviated ``CIGS'', which
+\href{https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&id=228&chapter=10&lang=en}{many
+  countries have adopted}) permits the disclaimer of warranties, so
+jurisdictions adopting this treaty allow some form of warranty
+disclaimer\footnote{Scholars continue to debate to what extent CISG applies to software
+  licenses.  For example, Diedrich concluded that ``CISG is prima facie
+  applicable to international transactions involving the transfer of computer
+  software for a price'', but Sono disagrees with this ``prevailing view'',
+  presenting an ``analysis [that] restricts the applicability of the CISG to
+  software transactions by excluding `license contracts'''.  (See
+  \href{http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/biblio/diedrich1.html}{Frank
+    Diedrich, \textit{The CISG and Computer Software Revisited}}, 6 Vindobona
+  Journal of International Commercial Law and Arbitration, Supplement 55--75
+  (2002), and
+\href{http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/biblio/sono6.html}{Hiroo Sono,
+  \textit{The Applicability and Non-Applicability of the CISG to Software
+    Transactions}}, Camilla B. Andersen \& Ulrich G. Schroeter eds., Sharing
+International Commercial Law across National Boundaries: Festschrift for
+Albert H. Kritzer on the Occasion of his Eightieth Birthday, Wildy, Simmonds
+\& Hill Publishing (2008) 512--526.)}.
+Nevertheless, to account for possible jurisdictional variances regarding this
+or any other issue, GPLv2~\S11 contains
+a jurisdictional savings provision, which
+states that it is to be interpreted only as broadly as allowed by applicable
+law.  Such a provision ensures that both it, and the entire GPL, is
+enforceable in any jurisdiction, regardless of any particular law regarding
+the permissibility of certain warranty disclaimers.
 
 Finally, one important point to remember when reading GPLv2~\S11 is that GPLv2~\S1
 permits the sale of warranty as an additional service, which GPLv2~\S11 affirms.