Rework these two paragraphs.
As previously written, these two paragraphs were saying very little with a lot of words. I've attempted to rework it a bit.
This commit is contained in:
parent
20361c3263
commit
3e638118b8
1 changed files with 9 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -157,13 +157,18 @@ the GPL'd components.\footnote{However, these programs do often combine
|
|||
with LGPL'd libraries. This is discussed in detail in \S~\ref{lgpl}.}
|
||||
In the latter case, where the work is unquestionably a separate work of
|
||||
creative expression, no copyleft provisions are invoked.
|
||||
The core compliance issue faced, thus, in such a situation, is not an discussion of what is or is not a
|
||||
combined or derivative work, but rather, issues related to distribution and
|
||||
conveyance of binary works based on GPL'd source, but without Complete,
|
||||
Corresponding Source. This tutorial therefore focuses primarily on that issue.
|
||||
|
||||
Admittedly, a tiny
|
||||
minority of situations lie outside these two categories, and thus
|
||||
do involve close questions about derivative and combined works. Those
|
||||
situations admittedly do require a highly
|
||||
minority of compliance situations relate to question of derivative and
|
||||
combined words. Those
|
||||
situations are so rare, and the details from situation to situation differ
|
||||
greatly. Thus, such situations require a highly
|
||||
fact-dependent analysis and cannot be addressed in a general-purpose
|
||||
document, anyway.
|
||||
document such as this one.
|
||||
|
||||
\medskip
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue