Merge these two paragraphs into one.

This commit is contained in:
Bradley M. Kuhn 2014-03-19 09:50:51 -04:00
parent ca13e0dcb1
commit 37f3a75b9d

View file

@ -2257,6 +2257,8 @@ as bytecode. The definition of object code also ensures that licensees
cannot escape their obligations under the GPL by resorting to shrouded cannot escape their obligations under the GPL by resorting to shrouded
source or obfuscated programming. source or obfuscated programming.
% FIXME: CCS Coresponding Source updated to newer definition in later drafts
Keeping with the desire to ``round up'' definitions that were spread Keeping with the desire to ``round up'' definitions that were spread
throughout the text of GPLv2, the definition of CCS\footnote{Note that the throughout the text of GPLv2, the definition of CCS\footnote{Note that the
preferred term by those who work with both GPLv2 and GPLv3 is ``Complete preferred term by those who work with both GPLv2 and GPLv3 is ``Complete
@ -2268,18 +2270,13 @@ throughout the text of GPLv2, the definition of CCS\footnote{Note that the
(sometimes, ``C&CS'') was so widespread among GPL enforcers that its use (sometimes, ``C&CS'') was so widespread among GPL enforcers that its use
continues even though GPLv3-focused experts tend to say just the defined continues even though GPLv3-focused experts tend to say just the defined
term of ``Corresponding Source''.}, or, as GPLv3 officially calls it, term of ``Corresponding Source''.}, or, as GPLv3 officially calls it,
``Corresponding Source'', is given in GPLv3~\S1\P4 ``Corresponding Source'', is given in GPLv3~\S1\P4. This definition is as
broad as necessary to protect users' exercise of their rights under the
% FIXME: CCS Coresponding Source updated to newer definition in later drafts GPL. We follow the definition with particular examples to remove any doubt
that they are to be considered Complete Corresponding Source Code. We wish to
This definition of ``Corresponding Source'' make completely clear that a licensee cannot avoid complying with the
is as broad as necessary to protect users' requirements of the GPL by dynamically linking an add-on component to the
exercise of their rights under the GPL. We follow the definition with original version of a program.
particular examples to remove any doubt that they are to be considered
Complete Corresponding Source Code. We wish to make completely clear
that a licensee cannot avoid complying with the requirements of the GPL
by dynamically linking an add-on component to the original version of a
program.
Though the definition of Complete Corresponding Source Code in the Though the definition of Complete Corresponding Source Code in the
second paragraph of section 1 is expansive, it is not sufficient to second paragraph of section 1 is expansive, it is not sufficient to