From 366854aaf15c0551676f4be0348a4c3d54857031 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Bradley M. Kuhn" Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 12:07:34 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Properly quote the & in C&CS. HT tmarble. note: might need to escape the & in C&CS [12:05] --- gpl-lgpl.tex | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gpl-lgpl.tex b/gpl-lgpl.tex index c0ed489..1e2feb1 100644 --- a/gpl-lgpl.tex +++ b/gpl-lgpl.tex @@ -2386,7 +2386,7 @@ throughout the text of GPLv2, the definition of CCS\footnote{Note that the instead). However, both GPLv2 and the early drafts of GPLv3 itself used the word complete, and early GPLv3 drafts even included the phrase ``Complete Corresponding Source''. Meanwhile, use of the acronym ``CCS'' - (sometimes, ``C&CS'') was so widespread among GPL enforcers that its use + (sometimes, ``C\&CS'') was so widespread among GPL enforcers that its use continues even though GPLv3-focused experts tend to say just the defined term of ``Corresponding Source''.}, or, as GPLv3 officially calls it, ``Corresponding Source'', is given in GPLv3~\S1\P4. This definition is as