From 33e47ace6032149366216978f0714751ed75e62e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: donaldr3 Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 18:00:09 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] multiple edits --- gpl-lgpl.tex | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gpl-lgpl.tex b/gpl-lgpl.tex index c66123c..bf08bb3 100644 --- a/gpl-lgpl.tex +++ b/gpl-lgpl.tex @@ -2573,7 +2573,7 @@ on the users' behalf (just as the users' employees would have to act). The strict conditions in this ``contractors provision'' are needed so that it cannot be twisted to fit other activities, such as making a program available to downstream users or customers. By making the limits on this provision -very narrow, GPLv3 ensures that, in all other cases, contractors gets the +very narrow, GPLv3 ensures that, in all other cases, contractor gets the full freedoms of the GPL that they deserve. The FSF was specifically asked to add this ``contractors provisions'' by @@ -2668,7 +2668,7 @@ relate sections\footnote{These sections of the USC are often referred to as from circumventing technological measures that implement DRM\@. Since this is part of copyright law and the GPL is primarily a copyright license, and since what the DMCA calls ``circumvention'' is simply ``modifying the -software'' under the GPL, GPLv3 must disclaim such anti-circumvention +software'' under the GPL, GPLv3 must disclaim that such anti-circumvention provisions are not applicable to the GPLv3'd software. GPLv3\S3 shields users from being subjected to liability under anti-circumvention law for exercising their rights under the GPL, so far as the GPL can do so.