Rewrite of the paragraph about conspicuous warranty disclaimers.
I went looking for that case that Dan mentioned to me when I wrote that, but couldn't find it. He never told me what it was, so I don't think I should reference it. If we haven't found it in 10 years, maybe it doesn't exist?
This commit is contained in:
parent
618ddec730
commit
2e8178b28d
1 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions
12
gpl-lgpl.tex
12
gpl-lgpl.tex
|
@ -2097,12 +2097,12 @@ copyright licenses.
|
||||||
\section{GPLv2~\S11: No Warranty}
|
\section{GPLv2~\S11: No Warranty}
|
||||||
\label{GPLv2s11}
|
\label{GPLv2s11}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
All warranty disclaimer language tends to be shouted in all capital
|
Most warranty disclaimer language shout at you. The
|
||||||
letters. Apparently, there was once a case where the disclaimer language
|
\href{http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/2/2-316}{Uniform Commercial
|
||||||
of an agreement was negated because it was not ``conspicuous'' to one of
|
Code~\S2-316} requires that disclaimers of warranty be ``conspicuous''.
|
||||||
the parties. Therefore, to make such language ``conspicuous,'' people
|
There is apparently general acceptance that \textsc{all caps} is the
|
||||||
started placing it in bold or capitalizing the entire text. It now seems
|
preferred way to make something conspicuous, and that has over decades worked
|
||||||
to be voodoo tradition of warranty disclaimer writing.
|
its way into the voodoo tradition of warranty disclaimer writing.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Some have argued the GPL is unenforceable in some jurisdictions because
|
Some have argued the GPL is unenforceable in some jurisdictions because
|
||||||
its disclaimer of warranties is impermissibly broad. However, GPLv2~\S11
|
its disclaimer of warranties is impermissibly broad. However, GPLv2~\S11
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue