Rewrite of the paragraph about conspicuous warranty disclaimers.

I went looking for that case that Dan mentioned to me when I wrote that, but
couldn't find it.  He never told me what it was, so I don't think I should
reference it.  If we haven't found it in 10 years, maybe it doesn't exist?

gpl-lgpl.tex

@@ -2097,12 +2097,12 @@ copyright licenses.
 \section{GPLv2~\S11: No Warranty}
 \label{GPLv2s11}
 
-All warranty disclaimer language tends to be shouted in all capital
-letters. Apparently, there was once a case where the disclaimer language
-of an agreement was negated because it was not ``conspicuous'' to one of
-the parties. Therefore, to make such language ``conspicuous,'' people
-started placing it in bold or capitalizing the entire text. It now seems
-to be voodoo tradition of warranty disclaimer writing.
+Most warranty disclaimer language shout at you.  The
+\href{http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/2/2-316}{Uniform Commercial
+  Code~\S2-316} requires that disclaimers of warranty be ``conspicuous''.
+There is apparently general acceptance that \textsc{all caps} is the
+preferred way to make something conspicuous, and that has over decades worked
+its way into the voodoo tradition of warranty disclaimer writing.
 
 Some have argued the GPL is unenforceable in some jurisdictions because
 its disclaimer of warranties is impermissibly broad. However, GPLv2~\S11