Merge in text and do rewrites for description of GPLv3§4.

gpl-lgpl.tex

@@ -2698,8 +2698,32 @@ users who escape technical restriction measures implemented by GPL'd
 software.
 
 \section{GPLv3~\S4: Verbatim Copying}
+\label{GPLv3s4}
 
-% FIXME: there appear to be minor changes here in later drafts, fix that.
+GPLv3~\S4 is a revision of GPLv2\~S1 (as discussed in \S~\ref{GPLv2s1} of
+this tutorial).   There is almost no changes to this section from the
+GPLv2\~S1, other than to use the new defined terms.
+
+The only notable change of ``a fee'' to ``any price or no price'' in the
+first sentence of GPLv3\S4\P2.  The GPLv2\S1\P1 means that the GPL permits
+one to charge money for the distribution of software.  Despite efforts by
+copyleft advocates to explain this in GPLv2 itself and in other documents,
+there are evidently some people who still believe that GPLv2 allows charging
+for services but not for selling copies of software and/or that the GPL
+requires downloads to be gratis.  Perhaps this is because GPLv2 referred to
+charging a ``fee''; the term ``fee'' is generally used in connection with
+services.
+
+GPLv2's wording also referred to ``the physical act of transferring.''  The
+intention was to distinguish charging for transfers from attempts to impose
+licensing fees on all third parties.  ``Physical'' might be read, however, as
+suggesting ``distribution in a physical medium only''.
+
+To address these two issues, GPLv3 says ``price'' in place of ``fee,'' and
+removes the term ``physical.''
+
+
+%FIXME: what section does this belong in?
 
 Section 4 has been revised from its corresponding section in GPLv2 in light
 of the new section 7 on license compatibility. A distributor of verbatim
@@ -2711,19 +2735,6 @@ terms.
 % FIXME: needs context, needs match up to current text, and removal of stuff
 %        that's no longer there
 
-The original wording of this clause was meant to
-make clear that the GPL permits one to charge for the distribution of
-software.  Despite our efforts to explain this in the license and in
-other documents, there are evidently some who believe that the GPL
-allows charging for services but not for selling software, or that the
-GPL requires downloads to be gratis.  We referred to charging a ``fee'';
-the term ``fee'' is generally used in connection with services.  Our
-original wording also referred to ``the physical act of transferring.''
-The intention was to distinguish charging for transfers from attempts to
-impose licensing fees on all third parties.  ``Physical'' might be read,
-however, as suggesting ``distribution in a physical medium only.''  In
-our revised wording we use ``price'' in place of ``fee,'' and we remove
-the term ``physical.''
 
 % FIXME: say more and tie it to the text