From 26def8538a109af5e328f443c18a24589ae76264 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Bradley M. Kuhn" Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 17:53:40 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] FIXME note about restoring UCITA reference. --- gpl-lgpl.tex | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/gpl-lgpl.tex b/gpl-lgpl.tex index bb660d2..ec0d8ff 100644 --- a/gpl-lgpl.tex +++ b/gpl-lgpl.tex @@ -2419,6 +2419,12 @@ of GPL\@.\footnote{One of the authors of this tutorial, Bradley M.~Kuhn, has answered Kuhn's requests for case law that argues THIS IS INHERENTLY MORE CONSPICUOUS \textsc{Than this is}.} +% FIXME: Should UCITA be mentioned anywhere in here? It was previously +% mentioned elsewhere in the tutorial but it was out of context and not +% useful. If it should be mentioned anywhere, here is probably the spot, but +% it's not clear we should mention it at all, since it's specific just to two +% state/commonwealths in the USA: MD and VA. + Critics have occasionally questioned GPL's enforceability in some jurisdictions because its disclaimer of warranties is impermissibly broad. However, critics