From 26def8538a109af5e328f443c18a24589ae76264 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Bradley M. Kuhn" <bkuhn@ebb.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 17:53:40 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] FIXME note about restoring UCITA reference.

---
 gpl-lgpl.tex | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gpl-lgpl.tex b/gpl-lgpl.tex
index bb660d2..ec0d8ff 100644
--- a/gpl-lgpl.tex
+++ b/gpl-lgpl.tex
@@ -2419,6 +2419,12 @@ of GPL\@.\footnote{One of the authors of this tutorial, Bradley M.~Kuhn, has
   answered Kuhn's requests for case law that argues THIS IS INHERENTLY MORE
   CONSPICUOUS \textsc{Than this is}.}
 
+% FIXME: Should UCITA be mentioned anywhere in here?  It was previously
+% mentioned elsewhere in the tutorial but it was out of context and not
+% useful.  If it should be mentioned anywhere, here is probably the spot, but
+% it's not clear we should mention it at all, since it's specific just to two
+% state/commonwealths in the USA: MD and VA.
+
 Critics have occasionally questioned GPL's enforceability in some jurisdictions because its
 disclaimer of warranties is impermissibly broad.  However,
 critics