Copyleft/guide
6
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Add footnote describing how CCS reviews were done.

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Bradley M. Kuhn 2014-11-07 07:43:07 -05:00
parent 7e4ce7b710
commit 22ac76ad23
1 changed files with 7 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

8
enforcement-case-studies.tex
View file

@ -285,7 +285,13 @@ Specifically, this chapter discusses the purchase, CCS provision, and a
step-by-step build and installation analysis of a specific, physical,
embedded electronics product. The product in question is
\href{https://www.thinkpenguin.com/gnu-linux/free-software-wireless-n-broadband-router-gnu-linux-tpe-nwifirouter}{the
``TPE-NWIFIROUTER'' wireless router by ThinkPenguin}.
``TPE-NWIFIROUTER'' wireless router by ThinkPenguin}\footnote{The FSF of
course performed a thorough CCS check as part of the certification process.
The analysis discussed herein was independently performed by Software
Freedom Conservancy without reviewing any findings of the FSF, and thus the
analysis provides a ``true to form'' analysis as it occurs when Conservancy
investigates a potential GPL violation. In this case, obviously, no
violation was uncovered.}
\section{Root Filesystem and Kernel Compilation}