Add footnote describing how CCS reviews were done.
This commit is contained in:
parent
7e4ce7b710
commit
22ac76ad23
1 changed files with 7 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -285,7 +285,13 @@ Specifically, this chapter discusses the purchase, CCS provision, and a
|
|||
step-by-step build and installation analysis of a specific, physical,
|
||||
embedded electronics product. The product in question is
|
||||
\href{https://www.thinkpenguin.com/gnu-linux/free-software-wireless-n-broadband-router-gnu-linux-tpe-nwifirouter}{the
|
||||
``TPE-NWIFIROUTER'' wireless router by ThinkPenguin}.
|
||||
``TPE-NWIFIROUTER'' wireless router by ThinkPenguin}\footnote{The FSF of
|
||||
course performed a thorough CCS check as part of the certification process.
|
||||
The analysis discussed herein was independently performed by Software
|
||||
Freedom Conservancy without reviewing any findings of the FSF, and thus the
|
||||
analysis provides a ``true to form'' analysis as it occurs when Conservancy
|
||||
investigates a potential GPL violation. In this case, obviously, no
|
||||
violation was uncovered.}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{Root Filesystem and Kernel Compilation}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue