Conservancy/website
6
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Cut paragraph that has only historical significance.

Browse source 
This might belong in a long retrospective about the Best Buy case,
but it's been a decade since anyone had this confusion (to my
knowledge).
This commit is contained in:
Bradley Kuhn 2025-08-15 14:02:17 -07:00
parent 51d9367d7b
commit ec9cf5dd49
1 changed files with 0 additions and 7 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

7
conservancy/content/copyleft-compliance/past-lawsuits.html
View file

@ -79,11 +79,4 @@ the <a href="/docs/busybox-complaint-2009-12-14.pdf">original complaint is on
on <em>all</em> software included in the devices at issue in any lawsuit on <em>all</em> software included in the devices at issue in any lawsuit
that we've filed.</p> that we've filed.</p>
<p>One oft-stated confusion about this litigation was that we sued Best Buy
for sales of third-party devices in their stores. <strong>That is not
accurate</strong>. Best Buy had a house-brand DVD player under the
&ldquo;Insignia&rdquo; &ldquo;house brand&rdquo; that they produced as
their own product.</p>
{% endblock %} {% endblock %}