From 81ae78630983bc25323ae5ab9f084ecdbfb60065 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Denver Gingerich <denver@ossguy.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 15:48:50 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Fix formatting in Vizio docket summary

---
 .../content/copyleft-compliance/vizio.html       | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/conservancy/content/copyleft-compliance/vizio.html b/conservancy/content/copyleft-compliance/vizio.html
index 4fbc32a9..8b58b7a3 100644
--- a/conservancy/content/copyleft-compliance/vizio.html
+++ b/conservancy/content/copyleft-compliance/vizio.html
@@ -23,18 +23,18 @@ provided in (roughly) chronological order:
 <br>
 <li><a
 href="https://sfconservancy.org/docs/software-freedom-conservancy-v-vizio-complaint-2021-10-19.pdf">SFC's
-Original Complaint (2021-10-19)</li>
+Original Complaint (2021-10-19)</a></li>
 
-<li><h5>Removal (to federal court) and Remand (to state court)</h5>
+<li><h5>Removal (to federal court) and Remand (to state court)</h5></li>
 <ul>
   <li><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.837808/gov.uscourts.cacd.837808.1.0.pdf">Vizio's Motion to Remove (to federal court)</a></li>
   <li><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.837808/gov.uscourts.cacd.837808.14.0_1.pdf">SFC's Motion to Remand (to state court)</a></li>
   <li><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.837808/gov.uscourts.cacd.837808.24.0_1.pdf">Vizio's Opposition of SFC's Motion to Remand (to state court)</a></li>
   <li><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.837808/gov.uscourts.cacd.837808.32.0.pdf">Transcript of the hearing of the motion to remand</a></li>
   <li><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.837808/gov.uscourts.cacd.837808.30.0.pdf"><strong>Decision by the federal court to remand the case to state court</strong></a></li>
-</ul></li>
+</ul>
 
-<li><h5>Vizio's Motion for Summary Judgment</h5>
+<li><h5>Vizio's Motion for Summary Judgment</h5></li>
 <ul>
   <li><a href="https://sfconservancy.org/docs/2023-4-28_VIZIOs_Motion_for_Summary_Judgment_with_Reservation.pdf">Vizio's Motion for Summary Judgment</li>
   <li><a href="https://sfconservancy.org/docs/SFC_response_to_summary_judgement.pdf">SFC's response to Vizio's Motion for Summary Judgment</li>
@@ -42,11 +42,11 @@ Original Complaint (2021-10-19)</li>
   <li><a href="https://sfconservancy.org/docs/Transcript_Full_Vizios_MSJ_HearingDeptC-33.231005.pdf">Full transcript from the hearing</a></li>
   <li><a href="https://sfconservancy.org/docs/Order_Denying_Vizio_Motion_for_Summary_Judgement_12-29-23.pdf"><strong>Judge's
       ruling denying Vizio's Motion for Summary Judgment</strong></a></li>
-</ul></li>
+</ul>
 <li><a
 href="https://usethesource.sfconservancy.org/tmp_vizio_docs/software-freedom-conservancy-v-vizio-first_amended_complaint-2024-01-10.pdf">SFC's
-First Amended Complaint (2024-01-10)</li>
-<li><h5>SFC's Motion for Summary Adjudication</h5>
+First Amended Complaint (2024-01-10)</a></li>
+<li><h5>SFC's Motion for Summary Adjudication</h5></li>
 <ul>
   <li><a href="https://sfconservancy.org/docs/software-freedom-conservancy-v-vizio_2023-12-01_SFC-Motion-Summary-Adjudication.pdf">SFC's
   Motion for Summary Adjudication</a></li>
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ First Amended Complaint (2024-01-10)</li>
   reply to Vizio's response to SFC's Motion for Summary Adjudication</a></li>
   <li><a href="https://usethesource.sfconservancy.org/tmp_vizio_docs/order_partially_granting_SFC_motion_summary_adjudication.pdf">Judge's
   ruling partially granting SFC's Motion for Summary Adjudication</a></li>
-</ul></li>
+</ul>
 </ul>
 
 <h3>MEDIA CONTACT</h3>