From 7fbd1fd36fd68681de30a82b5c45a84081c28c2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Bradley M. Kuhn" <bkuhn@ebb.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 08:00:56 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] VMware lawsuit FAQ: id tags for two items.

---
 .../static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-faq.html         | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/www/conservancy/static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-faq.html b/www/conservancy/static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-faq.html
index 43127449..b45ba848 100644
--- a/www/conservancy/static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-faq.html
+++ b/www/conservancy/static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-faq.html
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
    code, tirelessly corrected and commented on other developers'
    contributions.</dd>
 
-  <dt>Are the court documents released?</dt>
+  <dt id="court-documents">Are the court documents released?</dt>
 
   <dd>Not currently.  Court proceedings are not public by default in Germany
   (unlike in the USA).  Conservancy will continue to update this FAQ with
@@ -115,7 +115,9 @@
   <dt>Can you explain further how VMware incorporated code from Linux into
   their kernel?</dt>
 
-  <dd>Conservancy prepared this diagram to show the technical situation as we
+  <dd>
+  <p id="diagram">
+    Conservancy prepared this diagram to show the technical situation as we
     understand it.  The diagram compares the technical architecture of a full,
     running Linux kernel with a full, running VMware kernel:
     <p>