From 5fec724d62139783e74a0434ab7d5bd086c53e62 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Bradley M. Kuhn" <bkuhn@ebb.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 08:40:20 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] missing close anchor.

---
 .../static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-appeal.html          | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/www/conservancy/static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-appeal.html b/www/conservancy/static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-appeal.html
index 8656950c..8f239674 100644
--- a/www/conservancy/static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-appeal.html
+++ b/www/conservancy/static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-appeal.html
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ software communities alike.</p>
 <p>We don't think so, but this case will let the court to decide that question.
 Either way, it's beneficial to our entire community to find out what the
 judges think.  (Check out our <a href="/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-faq.html">FAQ to find out more
-information.)</p>
+information</a>.)</p>
 
 <p>Help us pay for this expensive lawsuit and to generally defend software
   freedom and the GPL.  Help us show the world that copyleft matters.  We are excited