From 01b0b090a399083d05364b2266a9f46dd3663353 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Denver Gingerich <denver@ossguy.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 16:44:00 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] List previously analyzed versions in lawsuit FAQ.

---
 .../static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-faq.html            | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/www/conservancy/static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-faq.html b/www/conservancy/static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-faq.html
index 0da1f8a1..0b3398e5 100644
--- a/www/conservancy/static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-faq.html
+++ b/www/conservancy/static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-faq.html
@@ -433,7 +433,8 @@ static struct pci_driver tg3_driver = {
     </ul>
 <p>The above is but one piece of evidence among many, but hopefully it helps
   to explain some of the &ldquo;combined work&rdquo; violations found in
-  VMware's ESXi product.</p>
+  VMware's ESXi product.  Conservancy did a similar analysis for ESXi 5.0
+  as well as ESXi 5.5 Update 2 and found nearly identical results.</p>
 
 <dt id="verify">How can I verify Conservancy's technical findings above?</dt>