* Old implementation needs to see exactly the same rooms in exactly
the same order every time it loads new data, otherwise it will
create a duplicate entry for the room that differs only in display
order.
* New implementation ignores the display order when checking to see
if the room already exists.
- This has the effect of bouncing people to the login page if they're
unauthenticated, rather than returning a 502 because 'home' doesn't
exist.
- If they're authenticated but don't have a speaker profile, send them
to the speaker profile create page rather than just to the
dashboard.
Closes#26
"Next" is green, indicating that it's the default path, the way
forward. "Back" is available but blue.
For extra consistency, the initial "Get ticket" button is now also a btn-success
Let's say you've just installed symposion for the first time, and
you're running the intial `./manage.py migrate`
In that circumstance, there isn't an auth_group table. Naturally this
means you get Some Errors when trying to look for a particular group.
This change handles that error and drives on.
Also update vendored_requirements to make sure we pull this in.
subrepo:
subdir: "vendor/registripe"
merged: "9fc3645"
upstream:
origin: "git@gitlab.com:tchaypo/registrasion-stripe.git"
branch: "lca2018"
commit: "9fc3645"
git-subrepo:
version: "0.3.1"
origin: "???"
commit: "???"
Borrowed from the pyconau-2017 fork
To explain the impact of this - without this patch, if a user has
their invoice refunded, they are able to buy a new ticket; but
t-shirts, dinner tickets and so on do not become available to them
again because they are listed has already been in a cart for them.
Applying the patch now correctly checks to see if they currently have
a ticket.
From 731eee0a4c42a5013ee312b1ff50548e4d89a2ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Richard Jones <r1chardj0n3s@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 13:22:34 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] Fix query modification so that conditions are combined
Previously it was checking if the user has a product from the category
in a cart, and if there is no cart that is released (refunded).
Not *if the user has a product in a cart that is not released*.
This patch combines them. In the absence of a __ne operation in the
joining syntax, a double equality check is needed.
Signed-off-by: Richard Jones <r1chardj0n3s@gmail.com>
This follows from investigations in
https://rt.lca2018.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=283&results=eac0bd3c49f782d054f87d6b160ca36b;
in short, it seems that because this very long and complex method
creates several different objects at differnt times, the DB has been
getting out of sync; there are more votes recorded then there are
reviews, becuase the table that stores the vote count is updated
before the table that stores the vote and review information
This change is intended to make this operation (and the other
operations that the revew_detail handler performs) atomic, to prevent
things getting further out of step. It does *not* fix the existing
incosistency.
review_delete has been atomicified as well as it likely needs the same
treatment, but this has not been examined in detail.
Resolves:
File "/app/symposion_app/vendor/symposion/reviews/views.py", line 230, in review_random_proposal
proposals = proposals[:(len(proposals) + 1) / 2]
TypeError: slice indices must be integers or None or have an __index__ method
I have no idea why we do this in the database as some magic after we
call save(). I also have no idea why MySQL is seeming to think we want
type BIGINT UNSIGNED at the end of the
((2 * '+2' + '+1') - ( '-1' + 2 * '-2')) but it does.
Setting it to 2.0 or float(2) doesn't get the ORM to get this right, but
we are going to Decimal and making the 2 multiplier be of type Decimal
manages to make the ORM pull it's shit together and use something that
seems like we're okay with.
+1, -2 = 1 / 2 = -0.5 Score == True
Looks like it works.
UPDATE `symposion_reviews_proposalresult` SET `score` = CASE WHEN `symposion_reviews_proposalresult`.`vote_count` = 0 THEN '0' ELSE ((((2 * `symposion_reviews_proposalresult`.`plus_two`) + `symposion_reviews_proposalresult`.`plus_one`) - (`symposion_reviews_proposalresult`.`minus_one` + (2 * `symposion_reviews_proposalresult`.`minus_two`))) / (`symposion_reviews_proposalresult`.`vote_count` * 1)) END WHERE `symposion_reviews_proposalresult`.`id` = 1
* Tweaks help_text to indicate that travel assistance is to Sydney
* Includes the required migration
This migration doesn't change the DB so it's safe to apply with the system live.
The current ordering is based on what appears to be a random ordering
that happens to correlate to the last time the paper was submitted or
updated. Oldest to most recent.
This changes it to submission order so ordering doesn't change and ID is
a static, making it easier to move through a list of papers. "I last
looked at 24, so 25 is assured to be the next one I want to look at.
There's the thought of updated papers being looked at and voted on, but
it does not seem to me that this is supported or possible. In general
one would look at their un-reviewed list, and go off it, which puts
updates out the window.
We can certainly order on other fields if desired, but this one makes
the most since to me.
This was removed somewhere in 1.8, which means this results in a
failure. If I understand correctly, this "name" is now derived from the
model name's __str__ or something like that.
