Merge pull request #40 from lca2017/chrisjrn/20160813
Makes the random proposal button take you to under reviewed proposals.
This commit is contained in:
commit
9e498544c2
1 changed files with 42 additions and 24 deletions
|
@ -68,6 +68,38 @@ def proposals_generator(request, queryset, user_pk=None, check_speaker=True):
|
||||||
yield obj
|
yield obj
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
VOTE_THRESHOLD = settings.SYMPOSION_VOTE_THRESHOLD
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
POSITIVE = "positive"
|
||||||
|
NEGATIVE = "negative"
|
||||||
|
INDIFFERENT = "indifferent"
|
||||||
|
CONTROVERSIAL = "controversial"
|
||||||
|
TOO_FEW = "too_few"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
REVIEW_STATUS_FILTERS = {
|
||||||
|
# proposals with at least VOTE_THRESHOLD reviews and at least one +2 and no -2s, sorted by
|
||||||
|
# the 'score'
|
||||||
|
POSITIVE: lambda qs: qs.filter(result__vote_count__gte=VOTE_THRESHOLD, result__plus_two__gt=0,
|
||||||
|
result__minus_two=0).order_by("-result__score"),
|
||||||
|
# proposals with at least VOTE_THRESHOLD reviews and at least one -2 and no +2s, reverse
|
||||||
|
# sorted by the 'score'
|
||||||
|
NEGATIVE: lambda qs: qs.filter(result__vote_count__gte=VOTE_THRESHOLD, result__minus_two__gt=0,
|
||||||
|
result__plus_two=0).order_by("result__score"),
|
||||||
|
# proposals with at least VOTE_THRESHOLD reviews and neither a +2 or a -2, sorted by total
|
||||||
|
# votes (lowest first)
|
||||||
|
INDIFFERENT: lambda qs: qs.filter(result__vote_count__gte=VOTE_THRESHOLD, result__minus_two=0,
|
||||||
|
result__plus_two=0).order_by("result__vote_count"),
|
||||||
|
# proposals with at least VOTE_THRESHOLD reviews and both a +2 and -2, sorted by total
|
||||||
|
# votes (highest first)
|
||||||
|
CONTROVERSIAL: lambda qs: qs.filter(result__vote_count__gte=VOTE_THRESHOLD,
|
||||||
|
result__plus_two__gt=0, result__minus_two__gt=0)
|
||||||
|
.order_by("-result__vote_count"),
|
||||||
|
# proposals with fewer than VOTE_THRESHOLD reviews
|
||||||
|
TOO_FEW: lambda qs: qs.filter(result__vote_count__lt=VOTE_THRESHOLD)
|
||||||
|
.order_by("result__vote_count"),
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Returns a list of all proposals, proposals reviewed by the user, or the proposals the user has
|
# Returns a list of all proposals, proposals reviewed by the user, or the proposals the user has
|
||||||
# yet to review depending on the link user clicks in dashboard
|
# yet to review depending on the link user clicks in dashboard
|
||||||
@login_required
|
@login_required
|
||||||
|
@ -169,6 +201,15 @@ def review_random_proposal(request, section_slug):
|
||||||
if len(queryset) == 0:
|
if len(queryset) == 0:
|
||||||
return redirect("review_section", section_slug=section_slug, reviewed="all")
|
return redirect("review_section", section_slug=section_slug, reviewed="all")
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Direct reviewers to underreviewed proposals
|
||||||
|
too_few_set = REVIEW_STATUS_FILTERS[TOO_FEW](queryset)
|
||||||
|
indifferent_set = REVIEW_STATUS_FILTERS[INDIFFERENT](queryset)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if len(too_few_set) > 0:
|
||||||
|
queryset = too_few_set
|
||||||
|
elif len(indifferent_set) > 0:
|
||||||
|
queryset = indifferent_set
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Realistically, there shouldn't be all that many proposals to choose
|
# Realistically, there shouldn't be all that many proposals to choose
|
||||||
# from, so this should be cheap.
|
# from, so this should be cheap.
|
||||||
chosen = random.choice(queryset.all())
|
chosen = random.choice(queryset.all())
|
||||||
|
@ -381,8 +422,6 @@ def review_status(request, section_slug=None, key=None):
|
||||||
if not request.user.has_perm("reviews.can_review_%s" % section_slug):
|
if not request.user.has_perm("reviews.can_review_%s" % section_slug):
|
||||||
return access_not_permitted(request)
|
return access_not_permitted(request)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
VOTE_THRESHOLD = settings.SYMPOSION_VOTE_THRESHOLD
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
ctx = {
|
ctx = {
|
||||||
"section_slug": section_slug,
|
"section_slug": section_slug,
|
||||||
"vote_threshold": VOTE_THRESHOLD,
|
"vote_threshold": VOTE_THRESHOLD,
|
||||||
|
@ -392,28 +431,7 @@ def review_status(request, section_slug=None, key=None):
|
||||||
if section_slug:
|
if section_slug:
|
||||||
queryset = queryset.filter(kind__section__slug=section_slug)
|
queryset = queryset.filter(kind__section__slug=section_slug)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
proposals = {
|
proposals = dict((key, filt(queryset)) for key, filt in REVIEW_STATUS_FILTERS.items())
|
||||||
# proposals with at least VOTE_THRESHOLD reviews and at least one +2 and no -2s, sorted by
|
|
||||||
# the 'score'
|
|
||||||
"positive": queryset.filter(result__vote_count__gte=VOTE_THRESHOLD, result__plus_two__gt=0,
|
|
||||||
result__minus_two=0).order_by("-result__score"),
|
|
||||||
# proposals with at least VOTE_THRESHOLD reviews and at least one -2 and no +2s, reverse
|
|
||||||
# sorted by the 'score'
|
|
||||||
"negative": queryset.filter(result__vote_count__gte=VOTE_THRESHOLD, result__minus_two__gt=0,
|
|
||||||
result__plus_two=0).order_by("result__score"),
|
|
||||||
# proposals with at least VOTE_THRESHOLD reviews and neither a +2 or a -2, sorted by total
|
|
||||||
# votes (lowest first)
|
|
||||||
"indifferent": queryset.filter(result__vote_count__gte=VOTE_THRESHOLD, result__minus_two=0,
|
|
||||||
result__plus_two=0).order_by("result__vote_count"),
|
|
||||||
# proposals with at least VOTE_THRESHOLD reviews and both a +2 and -2, sorted by total
|
|
||||||
# votes (highest first)
|
|
||||||
"controversial": queryset.filter(result__vote_count__gte=VOTE_THRESHOLD,
|
|
||||||
result__plus_two__gt=0, result__minus_two__gt=0)
|
|
||||||
.order_by("-result__vote_count"),
|
|
||||||
# proposals with fewer than VOTE_THRESHOLD reviews
|
|
||||||
"too_few": queryset.filter(result__vote_count__lt=VOTE_THRESHOLD)
|
|
||||||
.order_by("result__vote_count"),
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
admin = request.user.has_perm("reviews.can_manage_%s" % section_slug)
|
admin = request.user.has_perm("reviews.can_manage_%s" % section_slug)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue