- edited "competitive bids" language to broaden scope from software developers to all "technical service contractors."
- made a few grammatical and wording changes to the section re: Community Members' (lack of) influence over a Project's technical direction
This commit is contained in:
parent
d68a14a6cb
commit
b36d3820b4
1 changed files with 12 additions and 13 deletions
|
@ -290,19 +290,18 @@ of a vote on the matter where he or she has a conflict of interest.
|
||||||
=== Procedures for Conservancy Retaining PLC Person's Services
|
=== Procedures for Conservancy Retaining PLC Person's Services
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Notwithstanding the above, Conservancy acknowledges that many PLC
|
Notwithstanding the above, Conservancy acknowledges that many PLC
|
||||||
Persons are software developers who can provide professional services
|
Persons are technical service contractors (e.g., software developers, documentation writers, website developers, etc.) who can provide professional services useful to advance computing and contribute to Conservancy's mission.
|
||||||
useful to advance computing and contribute to Conservancy's mission.
|
|
||||||
In many instances, a PLC Person will have the strongest mix of credentials,
|
In many instances, a PLC Person will have the strongest mix of credentials,
|
||||||
experience, and interest and availability to fulfill a software development
|
experience, and interest and availability to fulfill a technical service
|
||||||
contract desired by Conservancy and/or a Project. To address those
|
contract desired by Conservancy and/or a Project. To address those
|
||||||
instances, Conservancy requests Projects to follow the following procedures.
|
instances, Conservancy requests Projects to follow the following procedures.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* *Drafting the Software Development Proposal.* PLCs must draft
|
* *Drafting the Technical Service Proposal.* PLCs must draft
|
||||||
a written proposal for every software development project their Project
|
a written proposal for every technical service project their Project
|
||||||
wishes to fund. During the drafting process, if a PLC Person (or his
|
wishes to fund. During the drafting process, if a PLC Person (or his
|
||||||
or her family member), a PLC Person's employer and/or a fellow employee
|
or her family member), a PLC Person's employer and/or a fellow employee
|
||||||
of PLC Person's employer wish to be considered a candidate to fulfill
|
of PLC Person's employer wish to be considered a candidate to fulfill
|
||||||
the funded software development contract, that PLC Person has a conflict
|
the funded technical service contract, that PLC Person has a conflict
|
||||||
of interest and must recuse herself or himself from the proposal drafting
|
of interest and must recuse herself or himself from the proposal drafting
|
||||||
process, except to disclose material facts and to respond to questions,
|
process, except to disclose material facts and to respond to questions,
|
||||||
and must abstain from any vote to approve that proposal. All other
|
and must abstain from any vote to approve that proposal. All other
|
||||||
|
@ -311,14 +310,14 @@ document the PLC Person's abstention from the proposal drafting process
|
||||||
in the minutes of the next PLC meeting.
|
in the minutes of the next PLC meeting.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* *Selecting a PLC Person to Fulfill a Contract.* Once a PLC
|
* *Selecting a PLC Person to Fulfill a Contract.* Once a PLC
|
||||||
has drafted and approved a development proposal, the PLC is free to
|
has drafted and approved a technical service proposal, the PLC is free to
|
||||||
consider qualified candidates to fulfill the funded contract. If the
|
consider qualified candidates to fulfill the funded contract. If the
|
||||||
PLC wishes to recommend that Conservancy contract with a PLC Person
|
PLC wishes to recommend that Conservancy contract with a PLC Person
|
||||||
to carry out the work, the following criteria must be met:
|
to carry out the work, the following criteria must be met:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
** *Suggested Compensation.* The PLC must provide Conservancy's
|
** *Suggested Compensation.* The PLC must provide Conservancy's
|
||||||
Executive Director (or designee) with a suggested compensation (converted
|
Executive Director (or designee) with a suggested compensation (converted
|
||||||
into an hourly wage) for the software developer to be retained to
|
into an hourly wage) for the technical service contractor to be retained to
|
||||||
fulfill the funded contract.
|
fulfill the funded contract.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
** *Independent Assessment of Credentials.* The PLC (or an unaffiliated
|
** *Independent Assessment of Credentials.* The PLC (or an unaffiliated
|
||||||
|
@ -328,7 +327,7 @@ to fulfill the funded contract.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
** *Conservancy Retains Right to Request Competitive Bids.* PLCs
|
** *Conservancy Retains Right to Request Competitive Bids.* PLCs
|
||||||
acknowledge that Conservancy retains the right to ask for bids from
|
acknowledge that Conservancy retains the right to ask for bids from
|
||||||
software developers in addition to PLC Person to fulfill a given contract.
|
technical service contractors in addition to PLC Person to fulfill a given contract.
|
||||||
Should that instance arise, Conservancy's Executive Director (or designee)
|
Should that instance arise, Conservancy's Executive Director (or designee)
|
||||||
will consult with the PLC to select the candidate best suited to fulfill
|
will consult with the PLC to select the candidate best suited to fulfill
|
||||||
the contract within the budget allotted.
|
the contract within the budget allotted.
|
||||||
|
@ -339,8 +338,8 @@ to negotiate and execute contracts on behalf of Member Projects. In
|
||||||
turn, Conservancy pledges to negotiate all contracts zealously, putting
|
turn, Conservancy pledges to negotiate all contracts zealously, putting
|
||||||
the best interests of the affected Member Project first. To avoid
|
the best interests of the affected Member Project first. To avoid
|
||||||
any conflicts, PLCs must not engage in any pre-negotiation with prospective
|
any conflicts, PLCs must not engage in any pre-negotiation with prospective
|
||||||
contractors -- including PLC Persons -- beyond collecting the terms
|
technical service contractors -- including PLC Persons -- beyond collecting the terms
|
||||||
of the developer(s)' bid.
|
of the technical service contractor(s)' bid.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
== Project Community Members: Participating Corporations and Volunteers
|
== Project Community Members: Participating Corporations and Volunteers
|
||||||
|
@ -353,8 +352,8 @@ considered to be ``interested persons,'' and all decision-making
|
||||||
authority rests with the PLCs and/or Conservancy.
|
authority rests with the PLCs and/or Conservancy.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* *Community Members Cannot Direct Funds.* Community Members
|
* *Community Members Cannot Direct Funds.* Community Members
|
||||||
are free to offer suggestions and engage in open dialogue with PLC,
|
are free to offer suggestions and engage in open dialogue with PLCs and/or
|
||||||
key developers regarding a Project's technical direction. However,
|
key developers and architects regarding a Project's technical direction. However,
|
||||||
each PLC and Conservancy must together maintain sole and final control
|
each PLC and Conservancy must together maintain sole and final control
|
||||||
over that Project's technical direction and charitable mission. Community
|
over that Project's technical direction and charitable mission. Community
|
||||||
Members who make financial donations do not receive any additional
|
Members who make financial donations do not receive any additional
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue