Conservancy/license-additional-permissions
6
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Defined term "Output" should be "Covered Output" instead.

Browse source 
The word "output" (undefined) is used quite a bit in the body of AGPLv3.
Since an additional permission is read as part of the license itself, I don't
think we should define the term (notwithstanding the apparent case
sensitivity) -- particularly since some defined terms in AGPLv3 are not
capitalized.

Furthermore, this reinforces that we're primarily concerned about Output that
is a derived/derivative/combined work with a covered work under the License.
This commit is contained in:
Bradley M. Kuhn 2018-03-23 22:27:32 -04:00
parent 84d90abc70
commit d9313fd5e1
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

8
AGPLv3-Web-Template-Output-Additional-Permission.txt
View file

@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Package").
1. DEFINITIONS
"Output" means a covered work in the HTML, Javascript, and CSS languages generated by
"Covered Output" means a covered work in the HTML, Javascript, and CSS languages generated by
the Package that are deployed to create a website and distributed publicly.
The "Output Licenses" are, for covered works written in HTML, the Creative Commons
@ -20,9 +20,9 @@ Inc. ("LGPLv3-or-later").
2. GRANT OF ADDITIONAL PERMISSION
You have the following additional permission: the Output is licensed to you
under the Output Licenses provided that Output is comprised only of: (a)
Output generated by the unmodified Package, and/or (b) content that was not
You have the following additional permission: the Covered Output is licensed to you
under the Output Licenses provided that Covered Output is comprised only of: (a)
Covered Output generated by the unmodified Package, and/or (b) content that was not
already a covered work.
No additional permission is granted for any covered works that are not HTML,